金鐘清場後嘅革命策略

金鐘清場在即，相信比清旺角場更加容易，唔單止因為金鐘嘅人鬥志唔及旺角，最重要嘅係金鐘一向係偽左翼社運慣匪嘅盤踞地，佢地已經完全滲透同控制晒，只要配合匪方行動，立竿見影，即時清場，可以話無險可守。不過，金鐘個場冇咗，最大損失嘅唔係香港人，而係雙學、三子、泛民、社運慣匪之流，金鐘係佢地嘅神主牌，一旦冇咗，佢地即時變成無主孤魂，無容身之處，難免魂飛魄散。所以，就算金鐘清咗場，唔好灰心，應該開心，金鐘將革命搞到藝術節一樣，唔會有成果。一旦清咗場，等如清咗班社運慣匪同雙學，為革命清除障礙，革命就可以轉型，就可以觸發香港大革命﹗梁振英同志將會同你地再升級，大家準備好未？唔好辜負佢一番美意﹗

綜合近幾日嘅革命形勢，旺角場清咗之後，匪方同革命群眾主客之勢互易，革命群眾用遊擊戰術進行「鳩嗚」，匪方疲於奔命。呢個戰術好好，要加以提倡，喺呢個基礎上逐步升級。近日匪方已經筋疲力盡，可謂革命形勢大好。佢地唔拖得好耐，但係革命群眾可以拖落去，同佢地打持久戰。唔使再拖好多日，香港人就會得到全面勝利﹗點解呢？因為香港已經淪為警察國家，警察成為操作政治嘅重心，所以，拖垮警察就成為革命嘅關鍵﹗試諗下，如果冇警察「執法」，就算共產黨控制晒行政、立法、司法都冇用，因為根本冇人執法﹗所有政令都會變成廢話、所有法律都只係一紙空文，街上嘅秩序將由革命群眾話事﹗一切都要屈服於人民嘅意志﹗到呢個時候，人民嘅意志就係法律﹗就係行政命令﹗就係司法權﹗就係立法權﹗一切嘅權力盡歸群眾﹗民主將會用最極端嘅形式喺街上面實現﹗

拖垮匪方人員，唔一定要犯法，更加唔一定要畀人拉畀人打，甚至要盡量避免畀人拉畀人打，我地唔係要光環，我地要革命﹗而且要革命成功﹗連日嘅「鳩嗚」係基礎、係大革命嘅演習。喺呢個基礎上，革命群眾要做好以下三步嘅事：

一、組織「烈士旅」。喺呢兩個月革命期間，相信各位識多咗唔少朋友，而且，咁多事發生過，係人係鬼已經好清楚。係時候糾結志同道合又信得過、無問題嘅人，約埋喺「鳩嗚」中多啲練習，雖然而家大家冇盾喺手，更加冇武器，但係唔緊要，多練習點樣同匪方周旋，點樣用「雲集霧散」嘅戰術玩謝匪方，熟悉各街道嘅地理形勢，通通都好重要。

二、造盾。呢個係最基本嘅自衛手段，唔犯法。當然，而家無法無天，屋企有枝牙籤都可以拉你，但係一個兩個人造盾帶盾，就一定畀人拉；大家一齊造盾帶盾，成千上萬個人造盾帶盾，咁就拉唔到咁多人，變成冇得拉﹗造盾係升級嘅關鍵，一旦打破咗「和理非非」嘅心魔， 成個局勢就可以扭轉。烏克蘭人就係咁打返自己個江山返嚟﹗香港人點解唔可以？

三、武器。而家唔會有，但係當你地成咗勢，可以好快有。假如美國要武裝香港人嘅民兵隊，廿四小時之內可以做到，問題係香港人準備好未？有冇可以信得過嘅民兵隊？有冇似樣嘅政黨？好多人認為有駐港解放軍香港搞唔到革命。我同大家講事實，駐港解放軍嘅唯一作用係令香港人絕望，喺作反嘅念頭產生之前就令你自己自行否定呢種可能性。我亦可以同大家講，如果真係要打起上嚟，只要香港人有簡單裝備，就可以令解放軍連營都唔敢出﹗只要有美製半自動步槍、幾個火箭榴彈砲，民兵就可以用香港嘅複雜地形同佢地打巷戰，包保佢地有去冇回﹗至於中國嘅解放軍，一樣冇得打，一入香港市區，亦係死路一條﹗加上美國協防，相信連過深圳河都唔敢﹗你可能覺得呢啲嘢太遙遠太過天方夜談，但係三年前你都估唔到今日香港可以變成咁影樣卦？當你諗到，你唔反抗，一兩年內，秋後算帳陸續有來，你會輸到渣都冇，咁你就會覺得第三步其實都好可取﹗不過，要做到第三步，先要做好頭兩步；做好頭兩步，中共屈服嘅機會已經好高，第三步隨時可以慳返。

圖片說明：十一月三十號晚有人手持羊羊盾喺金鐘抗爭。見到呢個盾，我見到希望﹗

二零一四年十二月一日

城邦開國劇本大綱

凡係政治，都係一陰一陽一明一暗咁做，所以，表面畀得你睇嘅都係假象，呢個就係點解我寧願運用想像力諗各種陰謀論嘅理由。

香港城邦建國嘅背景係中共倒台在即，各國——包括中國共產黨——都為咗自身利益作出準備。佢地既要保障現有利益，亦要盡力影響將來嘅局面以確保新形勢下嘅利益。香港獨立係最符合各方利益嘅方案，所以，不論係中國定係列強都喺好耐以前安插好晒自己人做緊嘢。

喺香港，梁振英係英國特務，主要工作係將香港推向革命，所以，講穿咗，佢都係同國師一樣係城邦論者。梁振英在明，國師在暗：梁振英在位，國師在野；梁振英 負責行動，國師負責理論；梁振英三年前參選、兩年前當選，國師三年前開facebook大講城邦論；梁振英步步進迫，國師循循善誘。二人一陰一陽互相配 合，共同嘅目標係喺香港嘅「解殖」過程中培養香港嘅革命群眾。因為要香港獨立，必先反中；要反中，必先亂港；要亂港，必先革命；要革命，就必先培養好革命 群眾。但係，香港人自從六七年左派暴動之後就好憎暴力，加上普及教育嘅訓練，又畀泛民用和理非非馴化咗三十年(泛民食盡其利，中外勢力最終難以容忍)，變得迷戀秩序、本能盡失，要香港人恢復正常，係要啲時間再培訓，就好似將馴化咗嘅動物放歸野外之前先須訓練一樣。只要各位細心，就會發現梁振英同國師二人近排嘅主題不約而同就係「升級」﹗只要群眾準備好，革命就可以推行，香港就可以獨立﹗梁振英會返英國安享晚年(如果走得徹唔使犧牲)，國師會出任香港大總統，接替梁振英做餘下要做嘅工作——梁振英係破，國師係立﹗

各位好好彩，有幸目睹甚至參與呢件近百年難得一見嘅政治大戲，可謂不枉此生﹗最精彩嘅政治就喺你身邊，既驚險又富娛樂性，水平拍得住文化大革命。希望大家把握機會，以各自嘅認識同能力，共同為呢件盛事出一分力。

附帶一提：香港獨立城邦建國好可能係「中華人民共和國」行憲實行多黨選舉或亡國計劃嘅一部份。習近平好可能喺消滅江澤民之後推行，做共產黨嘅蔣經國，畀共產黨可以和平落台；另一方面，馬英九點解出賣台灣人利益而推行同大陸融合嘅政策呢？因為佢係站喺「中華民國」或者國民黨嘅利益設想，隨時準備返大陸執政。 香港呢台戲，又似乎係一台更大嘅戲裏面嘅其中一幕。

*我本來諗住寫一篇《百變梁振英我估你唔到》嘅文，講梁振英同志嘅特務身份，已經醞釀多月，但係又唔想講中咗影響梁振英同志嘅計劃。不過，萬事萬物都好似註定咗咁，地球人已經阻止唔到特務嘅工作。而且，自從收澳洲公司錢呢啲黑材料爆出之後，梁振英都好似冇事，咁就更加令我安心係facebook講，以解我口痕之苦，算係自從我用facebook議政以來最重要嘅一篇文，自覺天機盡洩，但係相信本小姐人微言輕，睇到嘅人應該唔多，所以就用廣東話寫咗呢篇文算數。如果你有緣睇到，覺得好好笑，就一笑置之可也，癲婆嘅嘢，梗有一個兩個喺左近。

圖片說明：「何為邪鬼何為神，神鬼如何兩不分，但管拒邪修正外，何愁天地不知聞。」——車公廟靈簽第十九簽。

Legislature Nomination and Civil Nomination

(translated by Chapman Chen)

Since the occupation action has entered an organizer-free state, Hongkongers have to reach a consensus about constitutional reform as soon as possible, so that it will be promoted as the aim of the revolution, and that Communist China will clearly know what Hongkongers want, thus making rational compromises.

Civil nomination of Chief Executive candidates is put forth by pan-democrats, and legislature nomination by Prof. Wan Chin. These two forms of nomination tend to gradually become mutually exclusive. But I think this is unnecessary. Legislature nomination is entrance to the lobby while civil nomination is fire exit. The two are not only non-mutually exclusive but also complementary and indispensable to each other.

In other words, at a normal stage when politics has already been put on the right track, legislature nomination is enough to fully realize the will of the citizens, such that running for election through civil nomination becomes unnecessary. However, at an abnormal stage like now when politics is comprehensively distorted, running for election through civil nomination to uphold civil will is indispensable. It can even be considered a low-cost means to realize civil will without overthrowing the government by revolution.

Civil nomination is a safety valve to prevent revolution! Doubtlessly, Hongkongers, for the sake of their own political interests, have to fight for legislature nomination and civil nomination. But even Communist China and Western powers should take this as their aim of compromise if they do not want a blood-shedding revolution to break out and bring about enormous losses.
In particular, regarding the Communist Party of China, allowing Hong Kong to have legislature nomination and civil nomination has more pros than cons. The worst possible result is that Hongkong announces independence through referendum after obtaining full de facto sovereignty, which simply means Hong Kong returning to the pre-1997 situation. In that case, Communist China can get rid of Hong Kong as a burden but continue to reap profits from Hong Kong. What else is there to lose? Moreover, Hong Kong is a special administrative region, to which Tibet and Xijiang cannot be compared. How can this lead to other autonomous regions taking Hong Kong as a model and struggling for independence? So much the more, the possibility of Hong Kong going independent is very small. More probably, Hong Kong will become a second Wu Kan Chun, albeit on a larger scale.

Once Hong Kong builds up through legislative nomination and civil nomination politics committed to local interests, and exclude interferences from China and the West, the political situation of Hong Kong will return to the normal track and the interests of both China and the West will be protected. It is certainly better than the current messy situation, in which a blood revolution will break out any minute to overthrow the government, subjecting all powers to unnecessary political risks!
In order to strengthen the political function of legislature nomination, the two following measures have to be adopted:

• 1. Cancellation of functional constituencies and universal election of the Legislative Council. To use the door as a metaphor again, suppose at the entrance to the lobby, there are a large crowd of gangsters, how can decent women walk in and out with their mind at rest? Now the Legislative Council is thoroughly corrupt and controlled by pro-CCP running dogs by way of functional constituencies and split voting in such a way that civil will cannot be upheld at all. Isn’t this like a large group of gangsters blocking the entrance to the lobby? Unless they are wiped out, legislature nomination, etc. will be like empty talk!
• 2. Conditional “one person, one vote”. In order to prevent the communists from buying and rigging votes, I do not agree to unconditional general election of the legislature and Chief Executive. In order to be an eligible voter, every citizen must pass a simple examination, which is divided into two parts. In the first part, the candidate is required to fill in a form, the difficulty of which is similar to that of the BN(O) (British National Overseas) application form. Making mistakes over a certain limit (e.g. 3) in the exam will mean fail. The second part is an IQ test. Candidates with an IQ below, say 105, will lose their right to vote.

This assumes that in this city-state to elect legco members and the Chief Executive require intelligence above vulgar minds so that sound choices can be made. It also assumes that these people will vote according to public interests, including interests of those who do not have the right to vote, rather than out of selfishness.

The right to vote is bought with blood and even lives. How can it be contaminated by those paid off by corrupt politicians? Even before you can drive in public, you have to pass an exam, because it involves the safety of other people. Driving a car will involve the safety of a small number of people while monitoring a city-state involves the lives and assets of all the citizens. Isn’t it strange that one can vote without passing any test? That is why I advocate “conditional one person one vote”.

The interests of China and Western powers in Hong Kong rely on its stability. Only establishing localist politics can rescue Hong Kong from chaos. The only way to stabilize the political situation of Hong Kong is to set up a wholesome political system of democracy. In order to protect the wholesome political system of democracy, both legislature and civil nominations are required!

Hongkongers have to clearly recognize that legislature and civil nominations are exactly their targets. They must not be distracted by other baits, such as “Down with CY Leung”. They have to fight to the very end for legislature and civil nominations! Without legislature and civil nominations, we will never ever retreat!

圖片說明：來自「人大」的禽獸說：「先強姦，後檢討。腿張開之前，請先付五元﹗」
圖片來源：2014年6月12日「中國人在香港犯罪記錄」上載facebook的圖片。

*此文為《議會提名和公民提名》的英譯本，刊登於十一月廿四日《本土新聞》。